Why do innovative architectural ideas struggle with traditional construction?
- 4 hours ago
- 1 min read
A closer look at interior wall construction when geometry stops being simple.

Complex interior geometry looks great on drawings
But translating it into traditional construction is where projects start to bleed time and coordination.
Curves
Recesses
Variable thicknesses
Tight tolerances

This is where Traditional construction struggles
Each change multiplies cost and delay.
Custom formwork for every variation
High labor dependency
Tolerance stacking across trades
On-site adjustments that weren’t
in the drawings

The real cost isn’t the wall. It’s the coordination.
Structural + finishing treated as separate scopes
Rework during installation
Design intent diluted during execution

This same wall can be 3D printed as one continuous system
What you design is what gets built.
Geometry-driven, not formwork-driven
Digitally controlled tolerances
Minimal on-site intervention

Less compromise. More certainty.
Complex forms without construction gymnastics
Predictable execution timelines
Design freedom without exponential risk

Thinking of using complex geometry in your project?
We work with designers and architects early to assess what makes sense to print, what doesn’t, and why.



